The paper presented below is intended to reveal the institutional and substantive inconsistencies within the international legal system instituted for the governance of the oceans –UNCLOS-, from a literature review of various theoretical approaches related to fragmentation of international law. So, what is contained in the document it was initially oriented to the context of the reader by presenting the theoretical guidelines necessary for the understanding of the legal system in question, and then directed towards the realization of a critical analysis of the operation of such a legal system.
Published in | Social Sciences (Volume 4, Issue 4) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ss.20150404.13 |
Page(s) | 86-89 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2015. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Institutional and Substantive Inconsistencies, System Instituted for the Governance of Oceans, Fragmentation of International Law
[1] | RIVERO, J. (2010). El Tribunal Internacional de Derecho del Mar. Retrieved on September 24, 2014 http://www.revistafacultadderecho.edu.uy/ojs2.4.2/index.php/rfd/article/view/80/83. |
[2] | TRIBUNAL INTERNACIONAL DEL DERECHO DEL MAR. (2011). Tribunal Internacional del Derecho del Mar. Retrieved on October 18, 2014: http://www.itlos.org/fileadmin/itlos/documents/brochure/ITLOS_Brochure_spanish.pdf. |
[3] | ORGANIZACIÓN DE LAS NACIONES UNIDAS. (2001). Convención de las Naciones Unidas Sobre el Derecho del Mar – Convemar-. Retrieved on August 15, 2014: http://www.un.org/depts/los/convention_agreements/texts/unclos/convemar_es.pdf. |
[4] | CABRERA, M. (2013). El Tribunal Internacional del Derecho del Mar. La institución judicial para el régimen de los océanos. Retrieved on October 25, 2014: http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/bitstream/handle/10915/31598/Documento_completo__.pdf?sequence=4. |
[5] | HOYOS, C. (2000). Un modelo para investigación documental: guía teórico-práctica sobre construcción de Estados del Arte con importantes reflexiones sobre la investigación. Medellín, Señal Editora. |
[6] | CABRERA, Op.Cit. p. 48-51. |
[7] | ORGANIZACIÓN DE LAS NACIONES UNIDAS. Op.Cit. Parte XV Sección 1 Art. 285, Parte XI sección 5, Anexo VI Art. 14. |
[8] | INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE. (2014). International Court Of Justice. Retrieved on October 26, 2014:http://www.icj-cij.org/homepage/sp/files/notice.pdf. |
[9] | TRIBUNAL INTERNACIONAL DEL DERECHO DEL MAR. Op.Cit. p. 18. |
[10] | JIMÉNEZ, E., ARBUET-VIGNALI, H., and PUCEIRO, R., (2005) Derecho Internacional Público. Principios, normas y estructuras. Montevideo, Fundación de Cultura Universitaria, 1° edic. 20, pp. 190-191. |
[11] | TRIBUNAL INTERNACIONAL DEL DERECHO DEL MAR. (2010) Guía del procedimiento judicial ante el Tribunal Internacional del Derecho del Mar. Retrieved on October 19, 2014: http://www.itlos.org/fileadmin/itlos/documents/guide/Guide.Sp.2009-1.pdf. |
[12] | INTERNATIONAL TRIBUNAL FOR THE LAW OF THE SEA. (2009). Rules of the Tribunal. Retrieved on October 26, 2014: http://www.itlos.org/fileadmin/itlos/documents/basic_texts/Itlos_8_E_17_03_09.pdf. |
[13] | NACIONES UNIDAS, COMISIÓN DE DERECHO INTERNACIONAL (2006), Fragmentación del Derecho Internacional: Dificultades derivadas de la diversificación y expansión del Derecho Internacional. p.5. Retrieved on October 26, 2014: http://v880.derecho.unam.mx:8083/papime/pdf/5.pdf. |
[14] | Ibíd.p.5. |
[15] | Ibíd.p.5. |
[16] | CABRERA, Op.Cit. p. 9-14, 178. |
[17] | HORNA, Á. (2014). Apuntes acerca del Tribunal Internacional del Derecho del Mar: ¿Hamburgo v. La Haya? Retrieved on October 13, 2014:https://www.google.com.co/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0CBsQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Frevistas.pucp.edu.pe%2Findex.php%2Fagendainternacional%2Farticle%2Fdownload%2F7342%2F7560&ei=KehbVPrvM-y1sQT3s4Fo&usg=AFQjCNHWv4rVkOgjEGPcxfeM9fo4DKe3KA&bvm=bv.78677474,d.aWw. |
[18] | Ibíd. P. 4-5. |
[19] | RIVERO. Op.Cit. p.3. |
APA Style
Jorge Sánchez, Paola Tafur. (2015). Fragmentation of International Legal System Established for the Governance of the Oceans. Social Sciences, 4(4), 86-89. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ss.20150404.13
ACS Style
Jorge Sánchez; Paola Tafur. Fragmentation of International Legal System Established for the Governance of the Oceans. Soc. Sci. 2015, 4(4), 86-89. doi: 10.11648/j.ss.20150404.13
AMA Style
Jorge Sánchez, Paola Tafur. Fragmentation of International Legal System Established for the Governance of the Oceans. Soc Sci. 2015;4(4):86-89. doi: 10.11648/j.ss.20150404.13
@article{10.11648/j.ss.20150404.13, author = {Jorge Sánchez and Paola Tafur}, title = {Fragmentation of International Legal System Established for the Governance of the Oceans}, journal = {Social Sciences}, volume = {4}, number = {4}, pages = {86-89}, doi = {10.11648/j.ss.20150404.13}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ss.20150404.13}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ss.20150404.13}, abstract = {The paper presented below is intended to reveal the institutional and substantive inconsistencies within the international legal system instituted for the governance of the oceans –UNCLOS-, from a literature review of various theoretical approaches related to fragmentation of international law. So, what is contained in the document it was initially oriented to the context of the reader by presenting the theoretical guidelines necessary for the understanding of the legal system in question, and then directed towards the realization of a critical analysis of the operation of such a legal system.}, year = {2015} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Fragmentation of International Legal System Established for the Governance of the Oceans AU - Jorge Sánchez AU - Paola Tafur Y1 - 2015/07/25 PY - 2015 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ss.20150404.13 DO - 10.11648/j.ss.20150404.13 T2 - Social Sciences JF - Social Sciences JO - Social Sciences SP - 86 EP - 89 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2326-988X UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ss.20150404.13 AB - The paper presented below is intended to reveal the institutional and substantive inconsistencies within the international legal system instituted for the governance of the oceans –UNCLOS-, from a literature review of various theoretical approaches related to fragmentation of international law. So, what is contained in the document it was initially oriented to the context of the reader by presenting the theoretical guidelines necessary for the understanding of the legal system in question, and then directed towards the realization of a critical analysis of the operation of such a legal system. VL - 4 IS - 4 ER -