Bacterial vaginosis or vaginal bacteriosis is a disease of the vagina caused by bacteria. Bacterial vaginosis is an extremely prevalent vaginal condition and the number one cause of bacteria vaginosis among both pregnant and non pregnant women. It has been associated with a significant number of obstetric and gynaecologic complications such as preterm labour and delivery, premature rupture of membranes, spontaneous abortion, chorioamnionitis, postpartum endometritis, post-caesarean delivery, wound infections, post surgical infections, and subclinical pelvic inflammatory disease. Aim: The study was to determine the prevalence of bacteria vaginosis in pregnant women and to relate them to age groups, occupation and also to identify other agents of vagina infection in the studied population. Methods: A total of 226 pregnant women attending Plateau state specialist hospital with suspected cases of bacteria vaginosis between the months of January to December, 2012 were studied. High vaginal swabs (HVS) were collected using aseptic procedure and processed within 30mins of collection using standard procedures. A drop of 10% KOH was placed over the specimen on the speculum and the odour was noted. The PH of the specimen was determined using PH indicator paper. A wet preparation and Gram stain was carried and examine under the microscope. Result: Of the 226 specimen examined 53 (23.5%) were positive for bacteria vaginosis. Thirty six within 16-20 years 8 (22.2%) positive, 41 within 21 to 25 years 14 (34.1%) positive, 26-30 years had 53, 19(35.8%) positive, 42 of 31-35 6(14.3%) positive, 35 of 36-40years 4(11.4%) positive and 19 above 40 years 2(10.5%) positive (P>0.05). Second trimester had the highest prevalence of 25(30.1) and least 11(25.9%) recorded by the first trimester (P<0.05), Subjects with tertiary educational status had the highest prevalent of 14(41.2% while those at primary level recorded the least the prevalent of 13(17.3%). For civil servants had the highest prevalent of 10(52.6%) while the least was house wife 7 (19.4%). Other vagina infections were Candida species (45.4%), Gardnerella vaginalis (38.7%) and Trichomonas vaginalis (16.0%). Conclusion: Bacteria vaginosis is very prevalent among pregnant women in the study area, its diagnosis and treatment should be included in the routine antenatal care of pregnant women.
Published in | American Journal of Life Sciences (Volume 2, Issue 6) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ajls.20140206.15 |
Page(s) | 356-360 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2014. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Prevalence, Vagina Discharges, Gardnerella Vaginalis
[1] | Gardner H.L. and D. C. Dukes (1955). Haemophilus vaginalis; a newly defined specific infection previously classified “nonspecific” vaginitis. AmericanJournal Obstetric. Gynaecol. 69: 962. |
[2] | Rein,M.F.,Holmes,K.K.(1983)Non specific vaginitis, Vulvovaginal\candidiasis and trichomoniasis clinical features diagnosis and management Currclin Trop infect Dis 4: 281-315. |
[3] | MinkoffH., Brunebaun, AN., Schwartz, R.H., Feldman, J., Cummings, M., Crombleholme, W. (1984) Risk factors for prematurity and premature of membrane: a prospective study of the vaginal flora in pregnancy. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 150: 965-972. |
[4] | Gravelt,MC, Nelson, HP, Deroven, T.,(1986) Independent association o BV and Chlamydia trachomatis infection with adverse pregnancy outcome JAMA 226:1899-1903 |
[5] | Hillier, S.L., R.P. Nugent, D.A. Eschenbach, M. Krohn, R.S.Gibbs, D.H. Martin et al (1995) Association between bacterial vaginosis and preterm delivery of a low birth weight infant. New Engl J. Med. 333:1737-1742 |
[6] | Leitich, H., Bodner-Adler B., Brunbauer, M., Kaider, A., Egarter, C., Husslein, P. (2003).Vaginosis as a risk factor for preterm delivery: a meta-analysis, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology; 189: 139-147. |
[7] | Spiegel, C.A., Amsel, R., Eschenbach, D., Schoenknecht, F., Holmes K.K., (1980);Anaerobic bacteria in nonspecific vaginitis. New England Journal of Medicine 303: 601-607. |
[8] | Eschenbach, DA, Davick, P.R., Williams, BL., Klebanoff, S.J., Young-Smith, K., Critchlo C.M., Holmes KK., (1989).Prevalence of hydrogen peroxide-producing Lactobacillus species in normal women and women with Bacterial vaginosis, Journal of clinical Microbiology 27: 251-256. |
[9] | Hillier,S.L., Krohn, M.A., Rabe, L.K., Klebanoff, S.F., Eshenbach, D.A. (1993) The normal vaginal flora, H2O2-producing lactobacilli and bacterial vaginosis in pregnant women. Clinical Infection 16: S273-281. |
[10] | Terri Warren, RN (2010) Is it a yeast infection? Ferris, D. G., Littaker, M.S. Woodwward, L, Mathis, D., Hendrich, J. (1995) Treatment of bacterial vaginosis: A comparism of oral metronidazole, metronidazole vaginal gel and clindamycin vaginal cream. Journal of family practice issue 41(5): 443-449 |
[11] | Center for Disease Control and prevention.(2006) Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guideline MMWR 55:5-6. |
[12] | VanDyck, E, Meheus, AS, Piot, P (1999). Laboratory diagnosis os sexually transmitted disease. Joint United Nations program on HIV/AIDS Geneva Switzerland pp 18-21. |
[13] | Spiegel, C. A., Amsel, R.., Holmes, K.K(1983). Diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis by direct Gram stain of vaginal fluid 18 (1): 170-171 |
[14] | Amsel, R., Totten, P.A., Spiegel, C.A., Chen, KCS, Eschenbach, D. Holmes K.K.(1983). Nonspecific vaginitis. Diagnostic criteria and microbial and epidemiologic Associations. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology74: 14-22. |
[15] | Ibrahim SM, M Bukar, GB Galadima1, BM Audu, HA Ibrahim(2014)Prevalence of bacterial vaginosis in pregnant women in Maiduguri,North‑Eastern Nigeria Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice 17 (2) 155-158 |
[16] | Adeyaba, OA, Adeoye, MO, Adesiji, YO (2003) Bacteriological and Parasitological Assessment of vaginitis in pregnant women in Iseyin, Oyo state, NigeriaAfrican Journal of clinical and experimental microbiologyVol 4 (2)116-125. |
[17] | Govender L, Hoosen AA, Moodley J, Moodley P, Sturm AW. (1996) Bacterial vaginosis and associated infections in pregnancy. Int Journal Gynaecol Obstet;55:23‑8. |
[18] | Thomas T, Choudhri S, Kariuki C, Moses S. (1996) Identifying cervicalinfection among pregnant women in Nairobi, Kenya: Limitations of risk assessment and symptom‑based approaches. Genitourin Med;72:334‑8. |
[19] | Schneider H, Coetzee DJ, Fehler HG, Bellingan A, Dangor Y, Radebe F,(1998).Screening for sexually transmitted diseases in rural South African women.SexTransm Infect;74 Suppl 1:S147‑52. |
[20] | Aboderin BW, Motayo BO, Idiong DU, Okerentugba PO, Innocent-Adiele HC, Onoh CC, Nwanze JC, Okonko (2012) Occurrence of Gardnerellavaginalisin Women in Jos, Nigeria New York Science Journal, 2012;5(5)37- 40 |
[21] | Adinma JI, Okwoli NR, Unaeze A, Unaeze N.(2001) Prevalence of Gardnerellavaginalisin pregnant Nigerian women. Afr J Reprod Health 5:50‑5. |
[22] | Nwadioha, SI., DZ Egah, EB. Banwat, OOAlao (2010) Microbial agent of abnormal vaginal discharge in pregnant mothers attending prmary health care centers of Jos, Nigeria. Journal of Clinical Medicine and Research Vol. 2(1) 007-011. |
[23] | Adesiyi, YO, SS. Taiwa, DA. Adekanle, V.O. Oboro, SA Fayemiwo and O.O. Opaleye (2007) Bacteria vaginosis and pregnancy outcome in Oshogbo, Nigeria Research Journal of Medical Science 1 (4) 195-198. |
[24] | Fati, Kirakoya-Samadoulougou, Nicolas Nagot, Marie-Christine Defer, SeydouYaro, Nicolas Meda, Annie Robert (2008) Bacteria Vaginosis among Pregnant women in Burkina Faso. Sexually Transmitted Diseases Vol. 35 (25) 985-989 |
[25] | Ajani, Grace, OnyinOduyebo, MuyideenHaruna, Charles Elikwu (2012) Nurgent Scores of Pregnant women in a Trtiary Institution in Nigeria Advances in Microbiology 2: 531-536 |
[26] | Gibbs R. S., Pastorek K., Edelman R., and B. Krohn (1995). Effect of bacterial vaginosis in preterm delivery. N. Eng. J. Med. Microbiol. 333(26):1737-42. |
[27] | Sobel JD, Faro S, Force RW, Fox B (1998). Vulvovaginalcandidiasis.Epidemiologic, diagnostic and therapeutic considerations. Am. J.Obs. Gynecol., 178: 203-211. |
[28] | Nwokedi EE, Anyiam NN (2003). A study of high vaginal swabs in KanoTeaching Hospital .A preliminary report. Highland Medical ResearchJournal, 1:57-61. |
[29] | Ison CA, Hay PE (2002). Validation of a simplified grading of Gram stained vaginal smears for use in genitourinary medicine clinics, Sexually Transmitted infection 78: 413-415. |
[30] | Cotch MF, Pastorek JGH, Nugent RP.(1997). Trichomonasvaginalisassociated with low birth and pre-term delivery. Sexually TransmittedInfect. 74: 353 -360. |
[31] | Priestley CJ, Kinghorn GR. (1996) Bacterial vaginosis. Br J ClinPract 50:331‑4. |
[32] | Vogel, I., PoulThorsen, Bernard Jeune, BO Jacobsson, NielsEbbesen, Magnus Arpi, Annie Bremmelgaard, Birger R. Moller (2006). Acquisition and Elimination of Bacterial vaginosis during pregnancy Infectious Dis Gynaecol 94646. |
APA Style
Damen James Garba, Suleiman Shina Zabaze, Vem Silas Tabitha, Goltong James, Kahansim Makshwar. (2014). Microbiological Diagnosis of Bacterial Vaginosis in Pregnant Women in a Resource Limited Setting in North Central Nigeria. American Journal of Life Sciences, 2(6), 356-360. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajls.20140206.15
ACS Style
Damen James Garba; Suleiman Shina Zabaze; Vem Silas Tabitha; Goltong James; Kahansim Makshwar. Microbiological Diagnosis of Bacterial Vaginosis in Pregnant Women in a Resource Limited Setting in North Central Nigeria. Am. J. Life Sci. 2014, 2(6), 356-360. doi: 10.11648/j.ajls.20140206.15
AMA Style
Damen James Garba, Suleiman Shina Zabaze, Vem Silas Tabitha, Goltong James, Kahansim Makshwar. Microbiological Diagnosis of Bacterial Vaginosis in Pregnant Women in a Resource Limited Setting in North Central Nigeria. Am J Life Sci. 2014;2(6):356-360. doi: 10.11648/j.ajls.20140206.15
@article{10.11648/j.ajls.20140206.15, author = {Damen James Garba and Suleiman Shina Zabaze and Vem Silas Tabitha and Goltong James and Kahansim Makshwar}, title = {Microbiological Diagnosis of Bacterial Vaginosis in Pregnant Women in a Resource Limited Setting in North Central Nigeria}, journal = {American Journal of Life Sciences}, volume = {2}, number = {6}, pages = {356-360}, doi = {10.11648/j.ajls.20140206.15}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajls.20140206.15}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajls.20140206.15}, abstract = {Bacterial vaginosis or vaginal bacteriosis is a disease of the vagina caused by bacteria. Bacterial vaginosis is an extremely prevalent vaginal condition and the number one cause of bacteria vaginosis among both pregnant and non pregnant women. It has been associated with a significant number of obstetric and gynaecologic complications such as preterm labour and delivery, premature rupture of membranes, spontaneous abortion, chorioamnionitis, postpartum endometritis, post-caesarean delivery, wound infections, post surgical infections, and subclinical pelvic inflammatory disease. Aim: The study was to determine the prevalence of bacteria vaginosis in pregnant women and to relate them to age groups, occupation and also to identify other agents of vagina infection in the studied population. Methods: A total of 226 pregnant women attending Plateau state specialist hospital with suspected cases of bacteria vaginosis between the months of January to December, 2012 were studied. High vaginal swabs (HVS) were collected using aseptic procedure and processed within 30mins of collection using standard procedures. A drop of 10% KOH was placed over the specimen on the speculum and the odour was noted. The PH of the specimen was determined using PH indicator paper. A wet preparation and Gram stain was carried and examine under the microscope. Result: Of the 226 specimen examined 53 (23.5%) were positive for bacteria vaginosis. Thirty six within 16-20 years 8 (22.2%) positive, 41 within 21 to 25 years 14 (34.1%) positive, 26-30 years had 53, 19(35.8%) positive, 42 of 31-35 6(14.3%) positive, 35 of 36-40years 4(11.4%) positive and 19 above 40 years 2(10.5%) positive (P>0.05). Second trimester had the highest prevalence of 25(30.1) and least 11(25.9%) recorded by the first trimester (P<0.05), Subjects with tertiary educational status had the highest prevalent of 14(41.2% while those at primary level recorded the least the prevalent of 13(17.3%). For civil servants had the highest prevalent of 10(52.6%) while the least was house wife 7 (19.4%). Other vagina infections were Candida species (45.4%), Gardnerella vaginalis (38.7%) and Trichomonas vaginalis (16.0%). Conclusion: Bacteria vaginosis is very prevalent among pregnant women in the study area, its diagnosis and treatment should be included in the routine antenatal care of pregnant women.}, year = {2014} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Microbiological Diagnosis of Bacterial Vaginosis in Pregnant Women in a Resource Limited Setting in North Central Nigeria AU - Damen James Garba AU - Suleiman Shina Zabaze AU - Vem Silas Tabitha AU - Goltong James AU - Kahansim Makshwar Y1 - 2014/12/02 PY - 2014 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajls.20140206.15 DO - 10.11648/j.ajls.20140206.15 T2 - American Journal of Life Sciences JF - American Journal of Life Sciences JO - American Journal of Life Sciences SP - 356 EP - 360 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2328-5737 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajls.20140206.15 AB - Bacterial vaginosis or vaginal bacteriosis is a disease of the vagina caused by bacteria. Bacterial vaginosis is an extremely prevalent vaginal condition and the number one cause of bacteria vaginosis among both pregnant and non pregnant women. It has been associated with a significant number of obstetric and gynaecologic complications such as preterm labour and delivery, premature rupture of membranes, spontaneous abortion, chorioamnionitis, postpartum endometritis, post-caesarean delivery, wound infections, post surgical infections, and subclinical pelvic inflammatory disease. Aim: The study was to determine the prevalence of bacteria vaginosis in pregnant women and to relate them to age groups, occupation and also to identify other agents of vagina infection in the studied population. Methods: A total of 226 pregnant women attending Plateau state specialist hospital with suspected cases of bacteria vaginosis between the months of January to December, 2012 were studied. High vaginal swabs (HVS) were collected using aseptic procedure and processed within 30mins of collection using standard procedures. A drop of 10% KOH was placed over the specimen on the speculum and the odour was noted. The PH of the specimen was determined using PH indicator paper. A wet preparation and Gram stain was carried and examine under the microscope. Result: Of the 226 specimen examined 53 (23.5%) were positive for bacteria vaginosis. Thirty six within 16-20 years 8 (22.2%) positive, 41 within 21 to 25 years 14 (34.1%) positive, 26-30 years had 53, 19(35.8%) positive, 42 of 31-35 6(14.3%) positive, 35 of 36-40years 4(11.4%) positive and 19 above 40 years 2(10.5%) positive (P>0.05). Second trimester had the highest prevalence of 25(30.1) and least 11(25.9%) recorded by the first trimester (P<0.05), Subjects with tertiary educational status had the highest prevalent of 14(41.2% while those at primary level recorded the least the prevalent of 13(17.3%). For civil servants had the highest prevalent of 10(52.6%) while the least was house wife 7 (19.4%). Other vagina infections were Candida species (45.4%), Gardnerella vaginalis (38.7%) and Trichomonas vaginalis (16.0%). Conclusion: Bacteria vaginosis is very prevalent among pregnant women in the study area, its diagnosis and treatment should be included in the routine antenatal care of pregnant women. VL - 2 IS - 6 ER -